Prior to
develop the advantages of using silica fume to improve the concrete sulfate
resistance, it may be interesting to highlight the basic form of sulfate
attacks and the properties of sulfate resisting cement.
The use and
deterioration of concrete in environments containing sulfates has led to the
development of special sulfate resisting cements. It has also spawned
significant research into the use of supplementary cementitious materials to
improve sulfate resistance. Sulfate resisting cements (type V) have a low
C3A content to minimize the risk of sulfate attack. However, this does not
necessarily provide immunity:
- as certain sulfate reacts with hydrated lime and the calcium silicate hydrate the sulfate resisting cement provide less protection than expected.
- Low C3A cements are more susceptible to reinforcement corrosion attack.
- as certain sulfate reacts with hydrated lime and the calcium silicate hydrate the sulfate resisting cement provide less protection than expected.
- Low C3A cements are more susceptible to reinforcement corrosion attack.
The basic forms
of sulfate attack are the following:
The reactive aluminates in the cement will react with the gypsum in cement during hydratation. This process is harmless as the ettringite does not produce expansive forces and is stable in sulfate solutions.
If the quantity of reactive aluminates in the cement is too high, then their hydrate form will be available to react with sulfates after the cement has hardened.
This will produce expansive ettringite and cracking of the concrete.
The reactive aluminates in the cement will react with the gypsum in cement during hydratation. This process is harmless as the ettringite does not produce expansive forces and is stable in sulfate solutions.
If the quantity of reactive aluminates in the cement is too high, then their hydrate form will be available to react with sulfates after the cement has hardened.
This will produce expansive ettringite and cracking of the concrete.
Aluminate
Hydrate + Calcium Hydroxide + sulfate + water => Ettringite.
The second
principle cause attack is the acid interaction of culfates ions and calcium
hydroxide, causing gypsum formation.
Calcium
Hydroxide + sulfate + water => Gypsum
It has been shown that the cation (calcium, Magnesium, Aluminium, Ammonium) of the sulfate salt affects the type and the severity of the attack.
It has been shown that the cation (calcium, Magnesium, Aluminium, Ammonium) of the sulfate salt affects the type and the severity of the attack.
An alternative
solution for sulfate resistance: Portland type 1 – Silica Fume Blended cement.
The utility of Silica Fume for enhancing the resistance of concrete to attack in sulfate environment has been examined for many years. Cement Type 1 – Silica Fumeblended cements have been chosen for their ability to produce a durable concrete.
The utility of Silica Fume for enhancing the resistance of concrete to attack in sulfate environment has been examined for many years. Cement Type 1 – Silica Fumeblended cements have been chosen for their ability to produce a durable concrete.
SILICA FUME
serves to reduce the intensity of sulfate attack for the following reasons:
- By reducing
the cement content (replace by silica fume), the mount of lime and C3A present
in the concrete is reduced, so the amount of gypsum and ettringite then can be
formed is also reduced.
- Some of the lime that is formed during hydratation reacts with Silica Fume to form CSH. This further reduces the amount of lime that is available for gypsum formation.
- Reduction of concrete permeability. The higher CSH levels and the physical blocking of pores by the Silica Fume particles reduce the permeability of the concrete. Consequently, the rate of diffusion of sulfates into the cement paste, and hence the rate of sulfate attack, is reduced.
No comments:
Post a Comment